The image on viewfinder of that camera is very warm yet when the images are loaded onto the computer they are less so. Anyone have both that could provide a side by side? Congratulations on your decision. Can you compare side by side, please? People get all gnarled up about refresh rates and such, but the M240s EVF is fine for its limited uses.Focus Peaking. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. They also give the image sensor a better probability in identifying the right area of the scene to focus on in more automatic modes. Versus uses cookies to improve your experience on the site. Which is the better buy? I took the M240 because it offeres live view. Great article as always! Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Possibly Leica got the Bayer filter from a different supplier making the change needed. - Leica M 262 & Voigtlnder 50/1.2. Ah yes, sorry, of course the screen is actually useful! JPG Settings can be on the user assignable first screen and from that quickly turn on/off Monochrome. For a start, the battery in the M262 was a lot bigger than that in the M9. We've combed through the options and selected our two favorite cameras in this class. I remember initially thinking that the colours coming out of the M10 files seemed thin when compared to those of the M240 and the photos in your review of the M262 have reminded me of that. In fact, I pressed the LV (for live-view) button on the camera before I even took a photo. But nope, they included a hardly useful flourish, that as you say, looks like it was thought up but a marketing department. Leica m240 sony a7sii . Great review as always, I look forward to the M10 review I think the slimmer body size alone is a reason to upgrade, feel like a proper M body. Good thing, I don't need to upgrade further, as those are plenty enough for many years to come. I pressed the shutter button to take a photo and was fairly disappointed to see that the image the live-view screen had showed me was now captured as a photo. Using the zoom focus button on the front of the camera along with Live View is a good aid to focus in these situations.Ergonomics. It was designed and released after the M240 to offer an option to photographers who didnt need the bells and whistles the M240 had to offer. The Leica M9/ M8 B&W JPEGs can be created 95-99% in camera and I would say my black and white film images are 88% in camera/film developing, 2% scanning, 10% in computer to remove dust and do any basic darkroom style adjustments. homestead high school staff. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. I am looking to get into the Leica M systemhave been on various of the Leica Fora, discussing the merits of an M9 / M9P. Nice review.I bought a m262 this year when one of my pensions surprisingly came out.I wanted1] a digital leica m2] no video3] no live view4] no EVFBut i like to sometimes review a pic when i am out and about.The 262 is perfect for me and i love it.with the m-e 240 being announced i have noticed that used 262 cameras have already dropped in price so its possible i can buy a dream 2nd body.Meaning another 262. In fact, apart from INFO button/screen which reports battery and SD card information, and the play and delete buttons, the ISO button and the menu it brings up is really the only part of the screen-based interface I use. Thanks, James. By Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Fast continuous shooting, reliable autofocus and great battery life are just three of the most important factors. Plus it's lighter. Above $2500 cameras tend to become increasingly specialized, making it difficult to select a 'best' option. In my view the lens in use IS much more important than a bit colour differences M240/M262/other Ms. TheLeica M (Typ 262) has a pared-down feature set, an extra quiet shutter unit and a lower price than theM Typ 240. M-D, M-P, M240 and M262 photos. Its. This might be the better screen, or it might be residual live-view-denial telling me that the more simple M262 is a better camera for me. One of the advantages of live-view is the same as one of the advantages of rangefinder cameras they both allow you to observe the world outside of the frame. Now, I should just say at this point that when I first got my Leica M262 I found the exact opposite. If you like aluminium choose the M262, if you prefer brass go for the M240. They take on a garish orange tint that is hard to process in LR. Funnily enough, when searching to find out if I was the only one to notice this, I found this post on a forum where someone finds the same issue, but prefers the cooler screen of his Leica M240 to the later M-P version of the M240 which seems to have the same warmer screen as my M262. I turned off automatic review and theres no chimping, and with an ISO dial I dont even need to use any buttons throughout a shoot. Both are great cameras and either would be fine. The Leica M262 (and M240 or any other current M as of July of 2016) seems more like a bridge between the past and what could be the future of Leica. It was the same shape as the M262 I was used to, maybe a touch heavier, but not really noticeably in the hand. As an M10 owner I should say that yes, this camera is definitely a less is more sort of gadget. It's slightly lighter than the 240 and I have no use for video nor live view in a Leica. I shouldve read the manual! What is the highest ISO you are comfortable with the 240/262?I find the focus peaking on my M10 better than the Sonys Ive used. . A larger sensor will capture more light, which results in improved low-light performance, dynamic range, and general image quality. https://www.dailycameranews.com/, ShakeSphere Portable Blender E-Lid review, Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 Review: A Solid but Unremarkable Upgrade. This is exiting news in so many ways that I will now test your patience for a few minutes in trying to explain it. To me this seems like a hassle. In fact, I likely wouldnt be selling it at all if it werent for the fact that I recently and quite inadvertently gave myself a big chunk of M10 gear acquisition syndrome! Not because its a bad camera, quite the opposite; its a fantastic camera, I just find there to be so little to report or to get overly excited about. I dont need such features on my Leica rangefinders these are real cameras that I use properly, I dont need live-view with my real cameras! Im really glad I ordered it, the best Leica M camera Ive ever used! There are two ways to experience 35mmc without the adverts: Paid Subscription - 2.99 per month and youll never see an advert again! Yeah, I edit all my digital images, so I guess I dont really think about that. With the wrong card, the wait before the shutter is again available is bad. It does this by digitally enhancing the image output. Posted December 28, 2020 (edited) A m262 is limited to the lens choice as it rangefinder view only. It was the third major iteration of colour digital Leica M . Completely agree I really thought thats what they were going to do. Whats cool about having a Z6 (or other similar mirrorless camera) is that I can easily adapt the Leica M glass. In case youre confused, the M240 was the camera that followed the Leica M9. It leaves me with no desire whatsoever to upgrade at all and will be my sole digital camera for hopefully many years to come., [] a moment to reflect on this previous style of photography of mine. I wish I did. Simple. Hey all, I've owned an M6 for several years and in the next few months will be unloading a few of my higher-end film cameras to (downsize and) purchase a digital Leica to compliment my M6. Notify me of follow-up comments by email. Notify me of follow-up comments by email. Finally, a digital camera that truly feels like a good old analog Leica. The M262 was not available when I bought my my M240 but if I was buying now I would still go for the M240. Having live-view is great and the screen is an improvement but its too big for an M and the files look/feel like something that came out of a Sony. With a higher light sensitivity (ISO level), the sensor absorbs more light. I know youre right, I often talk about the bullshit involved in the upgrade path but it has an iso dial! The M262 was the stripped-back camera that came after the M240 and before the M10 and as regular readers of this website will know, I do like a stripped-back camera.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[580,400],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-3','ezslot_10',180,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-3-0'); Leica must have listened to some of their users who felt that they didnt need a lot of the features that the Leica M240 offered them, and created a camera that felt a little more like a natural progression from the M9. Verified purchase: Yes | Condition . Hello. For me, digital cant create that Portra look, or black and whiteand I really really tried to like the digital Ms, I guess thats where I am different I really enjoy the digital cameras, [] my heart. Changing from color to black and white takes a lot of menu meandering and I wish there was a way to place this setting into a favorites menu as in the M10 (I think). The M240 is a bit slow on the uptake, but I generally leave the camera on while on photo walks so not a real issue.Lock-ups. Its still inaccurate, but at least the photos look pleasant enough. Nice write-up. Unsurprisingly, the camera never really made a breakthrough in the video world so perhaps Leica decided it wasn't worth keeping it. Using an M this way does not give me the same fundamental photography pleasure as the M8 or M-9P do, but, what it does give me is the ability to scratch the inevitable itch that eventually comes to every M8/9/ME user the desire to use their M for other tasks theirs just cannot do (macro work, adapting other lenses for example). This has become a bit of a trend now, I buy a digital Leica, shoot with it for a while, decide to sell it for one reason or another, and then scramble to write about it in the final few days of owning it. True Leica again (after the M240), pure and sololy focused on the Photography essentials. The Leica M262 feels to me like almost everything anyone could or should expect from a digital Leica rangefinder. It usesa 24-megapixel CMOS sensor, a Maestro image processor witha near-silent shutter, and a quiet shutter-cocking motor. Help us by suggesting a value. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere. In fact, for this very reason the Leica M262 has actually presented me with the least inspiration so far. Whilst I fully get that it is down to personal preference, I just thought I would ask the question: M240 (or its E and P variants) or M262? The SET and the ISO buttons are much more useful though to be honest, I personally dont even use the stuff in the set menu either. They were taken about a minute apart as I only had one tripod and needed to put the . I admit, Im a bit of a snob with stills cameras. Of course Im now retired and not doing imaging for a living. Id probably buy a new car. Functionalism be damned. Sometimes, colours from M262 can be a bit more saturated than from M240, but as I use them only in recording DNG, post work can do what I want. A m262 is limited to the lens choice as it rangefinder view only. It was un-important to me; I own an M 262. You mirror my sentiments about the camera to a t! We case our eye over the options costing more than $2500 but less than $4000, to find the best all-rounder. Last thursday I thought for a few moments about selling my complete gear because of the new Q2, but then I thought about my beloved Summicron 90 from 1973 and my Tele Elmar 135 from 1963 and my Summilux 50 from 2017 and then I said to me: No!, I cannot sell them, I am not a fan of 28 mm.The only tiny shortcoming is for me the limitation of the maximum shutter speed (60 sec) and sometimes I miss an autofocus. If tapping the top plate sounded a bit hollow: remember its aluminium not brass in the 262, Sure. This can be used to capture moving objects using a fast shutter speed, or to take images in low light without using a flash. The even newer M-P Typ 240 purchase just opens up addtional opportunities of using a digital M as a multi-purpose tool. Thats why the M-D 262 and the M 262 have the same type name. It is capable of shooting stills in a lossless compressed raw format. I'm looking into both as well and leaning towards the 262 because I have no use for video with this purchase and I love the shutter. This might sound like a small criticism, and Im sure many wouldnt even notice or care, but actually it goes back to what I was saying earlier about familiarity. We and our partners use data for Personalised ads and content, ad and content measurement, audience insights and product development. (and more M ) when I look at results, there is no difference as they share same sensor. Sadly, that is the way of digital cameras my friend, a never-ending hamster wheel of upgrades. Some cards are woefully slow. . The following dropbox link to a small group of images hopefully illustrate these subtle but apparent colour densities. You can click any image for a larger view which is the best way to view it as this site compresses these down to what you see below . As @Jeff Skindly pointed out (when I asked about the M262), this might be a better place to seek views and opinions on this model. From what I understand the M10 has substantially improved this feature and this is an attractive change. Of course, Id skipped the M240 and gone from M9 to M262 though surprisingly, the menu system of the M262 is even more stripped back than that of the M9. So its not a financial burden to have it around, and selling it wont yield me that much cash, and I have no desire to sell it anyways since its my favorite M of all time that still serves some legitimate purpose. I need a new 50mm lens. Source: DxOMark. As the cameras are meant to have identical sensors, do we think this is just new owner's biased impressions (nothing wrong with that btw) is could there be something in this? Just experimenting, I took a bunch of photos of my mates Canon AE1 this was fun with a rangefinder; I could get used to this! Well worth seeking out. Unfortunately, my business partner has also vetoed the idea of me selling both M240 and M262 to buy an M10. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. I remember having an unexpected opportunity to fondle the M10, when it was first promoted, when a Leica rep. happened to visit my favorite camera shop. This page is currently only available in English. It is great way to capture things like the setting sun, or clouds moving across the sky. I cant even work out how to hold the Leica M240 for video, and whilst it has focus peaking, it certainly doesnt have the features the Atomos brings to the table. The use of a CMOS sensor allowed Leica to include two key features that the previous M9 didnt have. We have the top best product and truth reviews that will help make your decision easy. The renderings are quite good as a whole, and this feature is not contained in the M10 which relegates one to only the lens filter option.Card Writing Speed. You and Roger Hicks. Of course they can, but you have them.